
Now, much ink has been spilt, and keyboard keys used over the issue of male and female roles and such, and though I’d love to, at some point, present a full study of biblical exegesis and hermeneutics on this issue, I’m just going to say a few things from my recent experience and reflexions… Many are, or would say they are offended at my point of view, but the truth is, men lead. It’s in their nature. The problem is that most men lead badly, because of ... selfishness, indifference, whatnot... I don’t think I’m saying anything new here, by the way. It’s seen at a macro scale in the way western society has evolved in the past several decades, where so many women have become more and more the kind of girls guys think up in their fantasies and look at in magazines. The kind of leadership offered by men in most arenas is one of selfishness and indifference. The justifiable answer to the mess created by such an attitude is seen in the feminist response: “Screw you, we’re doing our thing!” And why should they follow such bogus leadership? Are they any less intelligent or capable? (Though does that mean they would be any less selfish...?) Equality is good - yes, I know, I’m saying more and more exciting, incredible new things - the problem is that the attitude backing a lot of those arguments exacerbates an existing issue. Feminism, at its extreme, calls women not to coexist, but to separate from men. This creates a mentality of division and war, how is that going to solve anything, when half the people in this world are the opposite sex from you.
Did we start it? Maybe… Stupid jokes which I myself have laughed to, comments en passant, both men and women have been at it really, and they get nastier as one pushes the boundary; once you snap out of it, you should realise: we’ve created a culture of rivalry between male and female, where we think about what we can get out of the opposite sex and what we can get away with saying and doing, instead of one of respectful complicity, where we aim to serve one another and look for opportunities to do so, since yes, we do have different gifting and wiring!
But instead, because of the rightful disgust thrown at the macho stereotype, masculinity is being redefined, and he should really get out of that chair and stop that makeover, ‘cause it’s not looking good. Oh what the hell, I said it! Now, real masculinity isn’t necessarily looking like Randy Couture (on the left, the warrior himself); but it certainly doesn’t have straightened hair and shaved armpits
(look at me! guy on the right with overpriced haircut and probably wearing eyeliner):
what can you expect from a guy who spends that much time on his appearance? Does he have his priorities down?
But instead, because of the rightful disgust thrown at the macho stereotype, masculinity is being redefined, and he should really get out of that chair and stop that makeover, ‘cause it’s not looking good. Oh what the hell, I said it! Now, real masculinity isn’t necessarily looking like Randy Couture (on the left, the warrior himself); but it certainly doesn’t have straightened hair and shaved armpits


My point is definitely not that outward appearance is what matters in masculinity, it’s about inner conviction and motivations. And there’s a sort of tug-of-war between people who want men to be, well, men, people who want men to be more like women and then there are those who just accept and conform to the trend in comfortable political correctness. Recently, I happened to talk to a few girls who admitted to really liking the style of “emo” guys… Why is that? What can they expect from them? Emotionality without substance. Fashion wins. Everyone else loses. (Someone told me recently that because I show sensitivity, I’m in touch with my feminine side… I’m not in touch, nor do I need to get in touch with my feminine side; I don’t have one, because, oh yes, I’m a man. On the other hand, I have plenty of honest, masculine sensitivity.) I know smart, sensible women who date losers without any vision or scope in life, and they just accept the state of affairs.
Why should women settle for anything less than solid, gentle men? They should be able to expect a better quality of men, men who, in the words of Chris Rock, “handle their business!” Neither the ones who treat them like toilets, nor the ones who expect them to be their mum; guys who run into relationships without thinking about what it will take to carry it forward, who really just want a girl hanging from their arm, like you wanted when you were a teenager. I had a chat with a girl at a party a couple weeks back, and talking about relationships, and about how I’ve not had any stories with girls for several years, she told me that I over-analyse situations and girls, and I don’t get into relationships because of a fear of getting hurt… This doesn’t happen to me very often, but though there may have been some truth there, I couldn’t help feeling that statement was wrong, something didn’t feel right about it (you know how when someone lays truth on you it just hits you right there - not that feeling). I put my finger on it several days later: it’s not that I have a fear of getting hurt as much as how I don’t want to cause unnecessary pain to someone else, because there’s no need to jump into relationships just to then jump out of them having hurt and left emotional scars on someone else. I felt good about that! I’m not saying this to praise myself, but in order to say “that’s what our thinking should be!” That’s how we treat women! Don’t go into a relationship you don’t think you can, or want to, lead!
Now, some may say “I find that offensive! The idea that men lead relationships is outdated and incoherent with our society!” Let me say, that means nothing: opinions are ever-evolving and so is society; the incoherence of society is phenomenal, where people judge those who hold to “outdated” ideals while thinking theirs are “innovative”, when these cycles have been happening for thousands of years, and 50 years down the line, people may believe something completely different anyway. I’ve seen marriages broken by indifference, struggles of leadership, and seen others, led by great men, blossoming with ever-increasing joy. So my ideas are outdated. But what’s the fruit? Gentle, sacrificial, caring, leading love. Wouldn't it be great to set that as the standard for men?
I’m not speaking as one who is qualified, but rather one whose eyes are fixed on that goal, to become less selfish, more caring, and ultimately, the kind of guy who will honour all women equally and love the one he marries all the way to the end.
7 comments:
i like this joey!
Chauvinistic pig!
Hello Joey
Thank you for this post. I am in currently writing something similar on my blog from a women point of view. I have found, especially recently, people (boys mainly) telling me "Karen you don’t have to be strong all the time" or "Karen you are over spiritualizes things". But the thing is I do as I do not have a father or parent I can go to with problems as I am my support for my family. I have God who I praise for continually strengthen me daily. He is who I lean on. This is not over spiritualising things, it’s the only thing I can do to get through the storms of life and he is often the only one (and the best lol) I can turn to.
Also I often get jokes about being "1 of the guys" and being told I am not that girie. I feel like saying "no, I am a girl". The reason women often come across as leaders is bcos we have no one in our lives willing to lead. I would not feel as the weaker sex if I had to be led by someone, I look forward to the day that someone is there for me to serve and help in their walk with God and someone is looking after me, making the decisions etc. I often get negative comments when I say this, especially in the job I do but its about serving each other, not a battle of someone being the “better sex”, you are very much equal but different. The reason women, especially in a church environment, now come across as strong and independent isn’t bcos we do not want to be led, it is bcos we are just trying to survive, when u don’t have people (and this again you do need men to do, rather than women often) to be strong and to guide you then you have to do it yourself. I am no saying we don’t get led as a church as our elders are amazing and feed us well but I am talking about our daily walks and the struggles you come across.
I totally agree with you, nowadays men just don’t seem to be men, often with them spending longer than me to get ready! Don’t get me wrong I think it is good for people to take care of their appearance but as women we often get attacked via our beauty and we need someone who is strong in this area to lead us away from the lies, not someone who is under confident and stating “well my hair just wont go straight today either, you think you have trouble”. Women also need someone, that when the going gets tough, they get strong.
It is hard for guys I think nowadays, especially when single, to lead and be strong for women without “stepping over the mark” and I do think you have to be discerning about what you do and how you do it but this isn’t something that we should use as an excuse not to act. I think if most people were honest, the thing that holds a lot of people back from being the things that men/women should be rather than what the world calls us to be is fear and pride. This is when we need to readjust our focus and remember that our identity is found in Christ, not this world and that his perfect love casts out all fear. When you remember that no matter what happens in life he is always going to be there with you and that he wasn’t to proud to hang on a cross then your perspective changes.
nice comment thatcher! so not a complaint but actually just a "men always get the blame!" haha i wanted to share a few thought from this side joey! nothing wrong with what you wrote!
i guess what i struggle with is that i don't want to be the kind of women that a man thinks he 'needs' to lead! Let me explain, i want to be led, don't get me wrong, i want to be vulnerable i want to be submissive etc but i think there are worldly versions of those, and Biblical versions. i hope i am seeking the latter. i don't want my future man to look at me and feel He needs to lead me, i don't want him to have to slow down in his running...as a friend of mine put it "i want to lead my wife, but i don't want to have to keep going back to drag her along" ha a bit harsh but i see his point. i want to be led first by Christ, as we all do and i guess my dream is that when i finally meet a man that yes he would lead my but i wouldn't be far behind and that actually it would inspire him to lead more, and run faster.... hmm sorry if that doesnm't make sense...maybe that thinking is why i'm still single! i just think some men come across as if they are looking for this vulnerable, naive, flakey girl that they can be strong for and i'm not that!
I thought the t-shirt slogan was quite funny. But then again, when I first saw it I didn't think, 'Oh, he must be referring to a woman.'
Having only just been introduced to your blog I am really enjoying reading the comments and your blogs. I totally agree with you Joey, especially the part about women starting to look like the women of men's fantasies and thought what an enormous pressure is put on both sexes in that area. I really like the perspective you write from. I always say it is a man's world.... :)
Post a Comment